For recruiting & staffing

Screening and follow-up shouldn't be why good candidates go cold

Volume kills recruiting operations at the front end — resumes piling up against a brief, candidates who never hear back, interviews that take three emails to schedule. An agent clears that queue so recruiters spend their time on the calls that need judgement, not admin.

Tell us the workflow

Where this fits in a recruiting operation

What you get

Where we are with this

This is one of our named target verticals, not a shipped client case study yet — we'd rather say that plainly than imply otherwise. What's real: the underlying qualify-then-escalate pattern is the same one running in our AI Caller demo today, and the back-office automation work described in back-office operations already covers resume screening as a case. See how we work for engagement terms and data handling.

Do you work with Bullhorn, Greenhouse or Loxo?

We don't require you to switch ATS. If it has an API or webhooks — and Bullhorn, Greenhouse and Loxo all do — we connect to it directly, so scored candidates and outcomes land where your team already looks.

Who owns the code?

You do, completely. The screening logic, scoring rules and integrations are delivered to your repository. No per-seat licence, no dependency on us to keep it running.

How long does it take?

A single flow — resume screening against a brief, or candidate follow-up — typically ships in one to three weeks depending on how many systems it touches.

Does it replace our recruiters?

No — it handles the repetitive front end: screening volume against a brief, chasing candidates for missing documents, scheduling first-round calls. Humans do the interviews and the judgment calls; the agent clears the queue in front of them.

Recognise this in your pipeline?

Tell us the workflow